AS overview
Test target: 2001:67c:10f4::1 · static prefix probe · address space: PI · prefixes announced: 1
prefix(es): 2001:67c:10f4::/48
Targets & per-vantage-point probe results (1 target(s) across 7 vantage point(s))
Source codes (hover any badge for full description): CUR=curated · NS/SOA/MX=DNS records · SPF=SPF TXT · DRV=holder-derived (www, ns1, mail, gw, …) · ATL=RIPE Atlas · PDB=PeeringDB · WHOIS=RIPE whois · RDAP=RIPE RDAP · HIT=IPv6 Hitlist · RTR=in-prefix path hop (router) · PRB=static prefix probe · SYN=synthetic prefix::1 fallback
| Target IP / hostname | Source | SRB host (SOX, Belgrade) | DE host (Berlin) | DE host (Düsseldorf) | NL host (go6lab) | ITA host (Karsolink) | SLO host (6connect) | SLO host (T-2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ping | 1500B | :80 | :443 | reached | ping | 1500B | :80 | :443 | reached | ping | 1500B | :80 | :443 | reached | ping | 1500B | :80 | :443 | reached | ping | 1500B | :80 | :443 | reached | ping | 1500B | :80 | :443 | reached | ping | 1500B | :80 | :443 | reached | ||
2001:67c:10f4::1 | prb | ✓ | ✗ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ? | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ? | ? | ✓ |
VIX / AAIX / SAIX / TIROL-IX / ERA-IX peering
Not an VIX / AAIX / SAIX / TIROL-IX / ERA-IX member, but our traceroute path crosses the VIX / AAIX / SAIX / TIROL-IX / ERA-IX LAN from SRB host (SOX, Belgrade) - reached via an VIX / AAIX / SAIX / TIROL-IX / ERA-IX-resident transit operator.
RPKI & ASPA
0 of 1 prefix(es) covered by a valid ROA, 1 not-found.
| Prefix | RPKI state | Reason | Covering VRP(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
2001:67c:10f4::/48 | - not-found | no covering VRP |
Random-IP probe (yarrp) into the AS' prefixes
We probed 35 arbitrary IPv6 address(es) inside AS211763's announced prefix(es). No router inside the prefix responded. The deepest visible hop was 2a01:190:1764:2e::2 at hop 10 - that router answers ICMPv6 Echo. This is not in AS211763's announced prefix; operationally it's the AS-edge / peering interface (often on an IXP peering address or an upstream's /127 link). The traceroute boundary is the AS edge: ICMPv6 Time-Exceeded responses from anything inside this AS are filtered.
ICMPv6 Type 2 (Packet Too Big) acceptance - active test
Vantage points disagree about Type 2 acceptance - transit ASes on one path may be filtering Type 2 even though the destination's stack accepts it on another path:
- SRB host (SOX, Belgrade): inconclusive: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probe. (ICMPv6 Echo + forged PTB)
- DE host (Berlin): inconclusive: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probe. (ICMPv6 Echo + forged PTB)
- DE host (Düsseldorf): inconclusive: no Echo Reply after PTB (probe 1300B). (ICMPv6 Echo + forged PTB)
- NL host (go6lab): Type 2 NOT honored. Forged PTB had no effect (filtered en route or stack ignored it). (ICMPv6 Echo + forged PTB)
- ITA host (Karsolink): inconclusive: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probe. (ICMPv6 Echo + forged PTB)
- SLO host (6connect): inconclusive: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probe. (ICMPv6 Echo + forged PTB)
- SLO host (T-2): inconclusive: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probe. (ICMPv6 Echo + forged PTB)
Why they disagree - reachability mismatch: One vantage couldn't drive a flow at all to this destination (no Echo Reply or no responding TCP port), so the active test had no behavioural change to observe. The other vantage's verdict is the only meaningful one here.
Failure detail - what to grep in your logs
| vantage | our source | your target | method | result | tested (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| belgrade | 2a09:ab81::91 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | icmp6-echo | no_echo | 2026-09-24T13:28:33Z |
| berlin | 2a06:d1c1:10b::cccc | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | icmp6-echo | no_echo | 2026-09-24T13:28:33Z |
| duseldorf | 2a06:d1c1:10d::aaaa | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | icmp6-echo | inconclusive | 2026-09-24T13:28:37Z |
| go6lab | 2a00:8642:42::75 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | icmp6-echo | not_honored | 2026-09-24T13:28:43Z |
| karsolink | 2a12:d8c0:105a:9001::a154 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | icmp6-echo | no_echo | 2026-09-24T13:28:34Z |
| odin | 2607:fae0:a000::42 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | icmp6-echo | no_echo | 2026-09-24T13:28:32Z |
| t2 | 2a01:261:313:b814:2a0:98ff:fe5b:13e4 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | icmp6-echo | no_echo | 2026-09-24T13:28:33Z |
Attempt log (belgrade):
icmp6-echo→ no_echo: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probedns-tcp→ no_tcp: connect failed: timed outtls→ no_tcp: TLS connect failedhttp→ no_tcp: tcp/80 not open
Attempt log (berlin):
icmp6-echo→ no_echo: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probedns-tcp→ no_tcp: connect failed: timed outtls→ no_tcp: TLS connect failedhttp→ no_tcp: tcp/80 not open
Attempt log (duseldorf):
icmp6-echo→ inconclusive (reply 1260 B before PTB): no Echo Reply after PTB (probe 1300B)dns-tcp→ no_tcp: connect failed: timed outtls→ no_tcp: TLS connect failedhttp→ no_tcp: tcp/80 not open
Attempt log (go6lab):
icmp6-echo→ not_honored (reply shrank 1360→1360 B)dns-tcp→ no_tcp: connect failed: timed outtls→ no_tcp: TLS connect failedhttp→ no_tcp: tcp/80 not open
Attempt log (karsolink):
icmp6-echo→ no_echo: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probedns-tcp→ no_tcp: connect failed: timed outtls→ no_tcp: TLS connect failedhttp→ no_tcp: tcp/80 not open
Attempt log (odin):
icmp6-echo→ no_echo: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probedns-tcp→ no_tcp: connect failed: timed outtls→ no_tcp: TLS connect failedhttp→ no_tcp: tcp/80 not open
Attempt log (t2):
icmp6-echo→ no_echo: no Echo Reply to 1300-byte probedns-tcp→ no_tcp: connect failed: timed outtls→ no_tcp: TLS connect failedhttp→ no_tcp: tcp/80 not open
To match the corresponding ICMPv6 packet on your side (host firewall, AS edge, or transit tap), look for our PTBs around the timestamps above:
sudo tcpdump -i any -n -e 'icmp6 and ip6[40] = 2 and (src host 2607:fae0:a000::42 or src host 2a00:8642:42::75 or src host 2a01:261:313:b814:2a0:98ff:fe5b:13e4 or src host 2a06:d1c1:10b::cccc or src host 2a06:d1c1:10d::aaaa or src host 2a09:ab81::91 or src host 2a12:d8c0:105a:9001::a154)'
If you see our PTBs arriving but the destination's TCP/Echo flow does not shrink, the drop is in the destination kernel (cause 3 below). If you don't see them at all, drop is upstream of you (cause 2). If you only see them from some of our source IPs but not others, the drop is path-asymmetric - at least one transit on the differing route is filtering.
What does "Type 2 not honored" actually mean? - click to expand
What this test does
Using the icmp6-echo method, we send a 1500-byte ICMPv6 Echo Request, then a forged ICMPv6 Type 2 (Packet Too Big) declaring path MTU=1280, and observe whether the next Echo Reply arrives split into IPv6 fragments. RFC 4890 requires hosts and intermediate networks not to filter ICMPv6 Type 2; the destination's TCP/UDP stack must act on a received PTB by lowering its Path MTU cache for that destination, which makes subsequent segments smaller.
What we measured
The TCP segment size your server emitted before our forged Type 2 was 1360 B; after, it was 1360 B. No change. RFC 4890 ("Type 2 messages MUST NOT be filtered") expects subsequent segments to shrink to fit a Path MTU of 1280 B.
Three plausible causes
- Your host firewall is dropping ICMPv6 Type 2 inbound. Many default firewall rule sets only allow Echo Request/Reply and Neighbor Discovery, silently dropping all other ICMPv6 types - including Packet Too Big.
- An upstream / transit network is dropping ICMPv6 Type 2 before it reaches you. Some transit ASes filter ICMPv6 messages other than Echo at the edge. The forged PTB never arrives, so your stack never has a chance to act on it.
- Your kernel is ignoring the PTB. Linux / BSD stacks normally accept ICMPv6 PTB and update the route cache, but a few sysctls (or a hardened kernel) can be configured to ignore PMTU updates - typically as part of an over-aggressive anti-spoofing or uRPF policy.
How to check & fix (Linux examples)
1. Confirm Type 2 is not blocked at the host firewall:
sudo ip6tables -L INPUT -nv | grep -iE 'icmpv6|packet-too-big' sudo nft list ruleset 2>/dev/null | grep -A1 'icmpv6'
If you see rules dropping ICMPv6 unconditionally, change them to permit at least icmpv6 type packet-too-big (and destination-unreachable, time-exceeded, parameter-problem per RFC 4890).
2. Confirm the kernel accepts incoming PTB:
sudo sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.accept_redirects net.ipv4.ip_no_pmtu_disc net.ipv6.route.mtu_expires
The defaults (accept_redirects=1, ip_no_pmtu_disc=0) are the right values for honoring PTB.
3. Live trace: while we have an open TCP flow with a small MSS (we run our test from 2607:fae0:a000::42 on odin, 2a00:8642:42::75 on go6lab, 2a12:d8c0:105a:9001::a154 on karsolink, 2a09:ab81::91 on belgrade, 2a01:261:313:b814:2a0:98ff:fe5b:13e4 on t2, 2a06:d1c1:10a::bbbb on amsterdam, 2a06:d1c1:10d::aaaa on duseldorf and 2a06:d1c1:10b::cccc on berlin), watch for our forged Type 2 arriving on your interface:
sudo tcpdump -i any -n -e 'icmp6 and ip6[40] = 2 and (src host 2607:fae0:a000::42 or src host 2a00:8642:42::75 or src host 2a12:d8c0:105a:9001::a154 or src host 2a09:ab81::91 or src host 2a01:261:313:b814:2a0:98ff:fe5b:13e4 or src host 2a06:d1c1:10a::bbbb or src host 2a06:d1c1:10d::aaaa or src host 2a06:d1c1:10b::cccc)'
If you see our PTBs arriving but TCP segments still stay big, the drop is in your kernel or NIC offload (cause 3). If you don't see them at all, the drop is upstream of you (cause 2) - ask your upstream(s) to permit ICMPv6 Type 2.
4. If your test target above (2026-09-24T13:28:43Z) is a host that you don't own (e.g. a third-party DNS / TLS server you happen to operate prefixes for), the verdict reflects that specific host's behaviour - try the test against a server you do own and we'll happily re-run.
RFC 4890 references: §4.3.1 (Packet Too Big - MUST NOT be dropped), and RFC 8201 for the broader PMTUD requirement.
Where the path divergence is
Per-vantage probe + verdict (headline):
- belgrade: probe
icmp6-echo→ verdictno_echo - berlin: probe
icmp6-echo→ verdictno_echo - duseldorf: probe
icmp6-echo→ verdictinconclusive - go6lab: probe
icmp6-echo→ verdictnot_honored - karsolink: probe
icmp6-echo→ verdictno_echo - odin: probe
icmp6-echo→ verdictno_echo - t2: probe
icmp6-echo→ verdictno_echo
Full per-method matrix (all four methods run at each vantage):
| vantage | icmp6-echo | dns-tcp | tls | http |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| belgrade | no_echo | no_tcp | no_tcp | no_tcp |
| berlin | no_echo | no_tcp | no_tcp | no_tcp |
| duseldorf | inconclusive | no_tcp | no_tcp | no_tcp |
| go6lab | not_honored | no_tcp | no_tcp | no_tcp |
| karsolink | no_echo | no_tcp | no_tcp | no_tcp |
| odin | no_echo | no_tcp | no_tcp | no_tcp |
| t2 | no_echo | no_tcp | no_tcp | no_tcp |
These vantage-level disagreements are rooted somewhere in the forward paths. Joining each per-vantage traceroute against the IP→AS lookup from our global yarrp mesh, the first hop where the paths land in different ASes is the most likely site of the offending filter / unreachable AS / Type 2 drop.
Suspect transit ASes (ranked by how often they appear at the divergence point on the path of the worse-classifying vantage): AS1764, AS6939, AS211763.
- From belgrade (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters an opaque hop at hop 7; from berlin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS1764. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From belgrade (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters an opaque hop at hop 7; from duseldorf (echo_only/Type-2=inconclusive) the same hop is in AS1764. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From belgrade (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS1764 at hop 6; from go6lab (echo_only/Type-2=not_honored) the same hop is in AS6939. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From belgrade (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS1764 at hop 6; from karsolink (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS6939. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From belgrade (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS211763 at hop 8; from odin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in an opaque hop. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From belgrade (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS211763 at hop 8; from t2 (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in an opaque hop. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From berlin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS50629 at hop 5; from go6lab (echo_only/Type-2=not_honored) the same hop is in AS31500. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From berlin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS50629 at hop 5; from karsolink (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS6939. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From berlin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS1764 at hop 7; from odin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS211763. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From berlin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS1764 at hop 7; from t2 (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS211763. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From duseldorf (echo_only/Type-2=inconclusive) the path enters an opaque hop at hop 10; from go6lab (echo_only/Type-2=not_honored) the same hop is in AS211763. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From duseldorf (echo_only/Type-2=inconclusive) the path enters AS211763 at hop 8; from karsolink (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS6939. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From duseldorf (echo_only/Type-2=inconclusive) the path enters AS1764 at hop 7; from odin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS211763. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From duseldorf (echo_only/Type-2=inconclusive) the path enters AS1764 at hop 7; from t2 (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS211763. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From go6lab (echo_only/Type-2=not_honored) the path enters AS31500 at hop 5; from karsolink (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS6939. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From go6lab (echo_only/Type-2=not_honored) the path enters AS50673 at hop 4; from odin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS5603. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From go6lab (echo_only/Type-2=not_honored) the path enters AS6939 at hop 6; from t2 (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS1764. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From karsolink (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS6939 at hop 6; from odin (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS1764. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
- From karsolink (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the path enters AS6939 at hop 6; from t2 (echo_only/Type-2=no_echo) the same hop is in AS1764. Last common AS: AS211763. The disagreement is most likely rooted in one of those two transit ASes.
Diagnosis is path-level, not packet-level: it tells you which transit AS is the prime suspect, not exactly which firewall rule is to blame. Use the tracepath6 output below (when available) for per-hop PMTU evidence on the same path.
✨ Diagnostic interpretation
Multi-vantage path map
Every hop of all vantages’ traceroutes toward the target, drawn left→right, grouped into per-AS bubbles (a hop seen from several vantages is one shared bubble, so converging paths merge). It answers two questions per vantage — shown on each source bubble as echo ✓/⚠/✗ · trace ✓/✗: did the destination reply to ICMPv6 Echo (✓ honored, ⚠ replied but PTB not honored, ✗ no reply), and did the traceroute reach it. A line to the target is drawn only when that vantage got an echo reply — solid if the PTB was honored, dashed if not (reachable but a broken-PMTUD / RFC 4890 violation). The path depth still shows how far the traceroute itself got, and runs of unanswered (* *) hops collapse into one dashed “silent” bubble. Open full size ↗
- ● SRB host (SOX, Belgrade)
- ● DE host (Berlin)
- ● DE host (Düsseldorf)
- ● NL host (go6lab)
- ● ITA host (Karsolink)
- ● SLO host (6connect)
- ● SLO host (T-2)
- ── solid line = echo reply, PTB honored (clean reach)
- — — dashed line = echo reply but PTB not honored (RFC 4890 violation)
- no line = no echo reply (never reached)
- ◉ target: green = clean, amber = reachable-but-violation / unreachable
- ⚠ suspected drop AS
- ⋯ silent (unanswered) hops
- ● IXP hop
From SRB host (SOX, Belgrade) echo onlyRFC 4890 ✗
filter likely at: destination AS211763 (CPS-IT) · min PMTU on path: 1500
Path (traceroute + mtr + PTR)
| # | IP / PTR | RTT | mtr loss | AS | AS holder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2a09:ab81::1 | 0.2ms | 0%* | AS60733 | PERKE-NET - ZORAN PEROVIC trading as Agencija Perke.NET, RS |
| 2 | sox-pn.sox.rs 2001:7f8:1e:8::3a | 0.4ms | 0% | AS13004 | SOX - Serbian Open Exchange DOO, RS |
| 3 | 2001:7f8:1e:8::3d | 0.3ms | 0% | AS13004 | SOX - Serbian Open Exchange DOO, RS |
| 4 | 2a02:2d8:0:a00e:232a | 11.3ms | 0% | - | |
| 5 | vix-ip6-et-0-1-2-0-r60.inx.vie.at.nextlayer.net @VIX / AAIX / SAIX / TIROL-IX / ERA-IX 2001:7f8:30:0:2:1:0:1764 | 12.8ms | 0% | - | NA |
| 6 | ip6-ae1-0-r35.inx.vie.nextlayer.net 2a01:190:1764:2d::2 | 36.7ms | 0% | AS1764 | NEXTLAYER-AS - Next Layer Telekommunikationsdienstleistungs- und Beratungs GmbH, AT |
| 7 | * | - | 0% | - | |
| 8 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | 17.9ms | - | AS211763 | CPS-IT - CPS-IT, AT |
tracepath -6
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.016ms pmtu 1500
1: _gateway 0.404ms
1: _gateway 0.560ms
2: sox-pn.sox.rs 0.587ms
3: 2001:7f8:1e:8::3d 0.820ms asymm 2
4: ae8-930.RT.IRX.VIE.AT.retn.net 11.341ms asymm 3
5: vix-ip6-et-0-1-2-0-r60.inx.vie.at.nextlayer.net 11.562ms asymm 3
6: no reply
7: no reply
8: no reply
9: no reply
10: no reply
11: no reply
12: no reply
13: no reply
14: no reply
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
Too many hops: pmtu 1500
Resume: pmtu 1500 From DE host (Berlin) echo onlyRFC 4890 ✗
filter likely at: destination AS211763 (CPS-IT) · min PMTU on path: 1500
Path (traceroute + mtr + PTR)
| # | IP / PTR | RTT | mtr loss | AS | AS holder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | xe-0-0-13-178.gw01.ber01.as59645.net 2a06:d1c1:100:b::1 | 0.3ms | 0%* | AS59645 | WYBT-NET - Tobias Fiebig, DE |
| 2 | ae0-2453.cr10.ber01.lwlcom.net 2a06:d1c0::dead:beef:1c02 | 0.7ms | 0%* | AS59645 | WYBT-NET - Tobias Fiebig, DE |
| 3 | ae0-150.cr10.fra01.lwlcom.net 2a00:c380:b200:230::174 | 9.9ms | 0% | AS50629 | LWLCOM - LWLcom GmbH, DE |
| 4 | ae0-100.cr10.fra02.lwlcom.net 2a00:c380:b200:230::215 | 10.4ms | 0% | AS50629 | LWLCOM - LWLcom GmbH, DE |
| 5 | ae0-10.cr10.fra06.lwlcom.net 2a00:c380:b200:230::236 | 9.9ms | 0% | AS50629 | LWLCOM - LWLcom GmbH, DE |
| 6 | nextlayer.peering.cz 2001:7f8:7f::c:31 | 17.9ms | 0% | - | NA |
| 7 | ip6-ae2-0-r35.inx.vie.nextlayer.net 2a01:190:1764:2e::2 | 29.0ms | 0% | AS1764 | NEXTLAYER-AS - Next Layer Telekommunikationsdienstleistungs- und Beratungs GmbH, AT |
| 8 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | 31.3ms | 0% | AS211763 | CPS-IT - CPS-IT, AT |
tracepath -6
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.032ms pmtu 1500
1: xe-0-0-13-178.gw01.ber01.as59645.net 0.476ms
1: xe-0-0-13-178.gw01.ber01.as59645.net 0.470ms
2: ae0-2453.cr10.ber01.lwlcom.net 1.131ms
3: ae0-150.cr10.fra01.lwlcom.net 10.369ms asymm 7
4: ae0-100.cr10.fra02.lwlcom.net 10.521ms asymm 8
5: ae0-10.cr10.fra06.lwlcom.net 42.365ms asymm 7
6: nextlayer.peering.cz 36.639ms asymm 8
7: no reply
8: no reply
9: no reply
10: no reply
11: no reply
12: no reply
13: no reply
14: no reply
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
Too many hops: pmtu 1500
Resume: pmtu 1500 From DE host (Düsseldorf) echo onlyRFC 4890 ✗
filter likely at: destination AS211763 (CPS-IT) · min PMTU on path: 1500
Path (traceroute + mtr + PTR)
| # | IP / PTR | RTT | mtr loss | AS | AS holder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | xe-0-0-12-142.gw01.dus01.as59645.net 2a06:d1c1:100:d::1 | 0.2ms | 0%* | AS59645 | WYBT-NET - Tobias Fiebig, DE |
| 2 | eth1-0-12-h5594.edge5-dus1.bb.wiit.network 2001:4ba0:92f4:3::1 | 1.0ms | 0% | AS24961 | MYLOC-AS - WIIT AG, DE |
| 3 | * | - | - | - | |
| 4 | lag30.core3-dus1.bb.wiit.network 2001:4ba0:ffe9:109::2 | 0.2ms | 0% | AS24961 | MYLOC-AS - WIIT AG, DE |
| 5 | lag8.core1-dus-ix.bb.wiit.network 2001:4ba0:ffe9:8::2 | 0.4ms | 0% | AS24961 | MYLOC-AS - WIIT AG, DE |
| 6 | de-cix.r60.inx.fra.de.nextlayer.net 2001:7f8::6e4:0:1 | 3.8ms | 0% | - | NA |
| 7 | ip6-ae2-0-r35.inx.vie.nextlayer.net 2a01:190:1764:2e::2 | 88.6ms | 0% | AS1764 | NEXTLAYER-AS - Next Layer Telekommunikationsdienstleistungs- und Beratungs GmbH, AT |
| 8 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | 24.3ms | 20% | AS211763 | CPS-IT - CPS-IT, AT |
Rate-limited ICMPv6: hop 8 (loss between 5% and 95% across mtr cycles - the router replies but only sometimes).
tracepath -6
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.042ms pmtu 1500
1: xe-0-0-12-142.gw01.dus01.as59645.net 0.347ms
1: xe-0-0-12-142.gw01.dus01.as59645.net 0.308ms
2: eth1-0-12-h5594.edge5-dus1.bb.wiit.network 1.301ms
3: no reply
4: lag30.core3-dus1.bb.wiit.network 0.396ms
5: lag2.core1-dus-ix.bb.wiit.network 0.546ms
6: de-cix.r60.inx.fra.de.nextlayer.net 4.021ms
7: no reply
8: no reply
9: no reply
10: no reply
11: no reply
12: no reply
13: no reply
14: no reply
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
Too many hops: pmtu 1500
Resume: pmtu 1500 From NL host (go6lab) echo onlyRFC 4890 ✗
filter likely at: destination AS211763 (CPS-IT) · min PMTU on path: 1500
Path (traceroute + mtr + PTR)
| # | IP / PTR | RTT | mtr loss | AS | AS holder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2a00:8642:42::2 | 0.8ms | 0% | AS203993 | GNA-DC1-AS - S.J.M. Steffann, NL |
| 2 | gw.friends.steffann.nl 2a00:8642:1000:f000::1 | 2.3ms | 0%* | AS203993 | GNA-DC1-AS - S.J.M. Steffann, NL |
| 3 | 2a00:1ca8:1::194 | 3.3ms | 0% | AS50673 | Serverius-as - Serverius Holding B.V., NL |
| 4 | 2a03:3f40::10:41 | 5.2ms | 0% | AS50673 | Serverius-as - Serverius Holding B.V., NL |
| 5 | 2001:b28:3ff::1b1b:0:1 | 27.5ms | 60% | AS31500 | GNM-AS - Global Network Management Inc, AG |
| 6 | be2.core1.cph1.he.net 2001:470:e:5f::1 | 26.1ms | 60% | AS6939 | HURRICANE - Hurricane Electric LLC, US |
| 7 | * | - | - | - | |
| 8 | * | - | 0% | - | |
| 9 | ams-ix.r06.nikh.ams.nl.nextlayer.net 2001:7f8:1::a500:1764:1 | 43.6ms | 0% | - | NA |
| 10 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | 45.0ms | 0% | AS211763 | CPS-IT - CPS-IT, AT |
Rate-limited ICMPv6: hop 5, hop 6 (loss between 5% and 95% across mtr cycles - the router replies but only sometimes).
tracepath -6
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.020ms pmtu 1500
1: 2a00:8642:42::2 0.905ms
1: 2a00:8642:42::2 0.822ms
2: gw.friends.steffann.nl 4.225ms
3: 2a00:1ca8:1::194 4.943ms
4: 2a03:3f40::10:41 5.729ms
5: 2001:b28:3ff::1b1b:0:1 28.649ms
6: no reply
7: no reply
8: de-cix.r60.inx.fra.de.nextlayer.net 42.720ms
9: ams-ix.r06.nikh.ams.nl.nextlayer.net 52.130ms asymm 8
10: no reply
11: no reply
12: no reply
13: no reply
14: no reply
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
Too many hops: pmtu 1500
Resume: pmtu 1500 From ITA host (Karsolink) echo onlyRFC 4890 ✗
filter likely at: destination AS211763 (CPS-IT) · min PMTU on path: 1500
Path (traceroute + mtr + PTR)
| # | IP / PTR | RTT | mtr loss | AS | AS holder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | karsolink-01.net.karsolink.com 2a12:d8c0:105a:9001::1 | 0.3ms | 0%* | AS204471 | KARSOLINK - 2S Computers SRL, IT |
| 2 | * | - | - | - | |
| 3 | 2a12:d8c0:101f:103::1 | 8.4ms | 20% | AS204471 | KARSOLINK - 2S Computers SRL, IT |
| 4 | * | - | - | - | |
| 5 | be47.core1.mil2.he.net 2001:470:e:69::2 | 12.7ms | 0% | AS6939 | HURRICANE - Hurricane Electric LLC, US |
| 6 | be1.core1.zrh2.he.net 2001:470:e:dd::2 | 14.6ms | 0% | AS6939 | HURRICANE - Hurricane Electric LLC, US |
| 7 | * | - | - | - | |
| 8 | be1.core3.zrh3.he.net 2001:470:0:7e0::2 | 13.9ms | 0% | AS6939 | HURRICANE - Hurricane Electric LLC, US |
| 9 | * | - | - | - | |
| 10 | ip6-ae2-0-r35.inx.vie.nextlayer.net 2a01:190:1764:2e::2 | 22.8ms | 0% | AS1764 | NEXTLAYER-AS - Next Layer Telekommunikationsdienstleistungs- und Beratungs GmbH, AT |
| 11 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | 23.7ms | 0% | AS211763 | CPS-IT - CPS-IT, AT |
Rate-limited ICMPv6: hop 3 (loss between 5% and 95% across mtr cycles - the router replies but only sometimes).
tracepath -6
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.039ms pmtu 1500
1: karsolink-01.net.karsolink.com 1.042ms
2: no reply
3: 2a12:d8c0:101f:103::1 8.775ms
4: no reply
5: be47.core1.mil2.he.net 12.599ms
6: be1.core1.zrh2.he.net 16.134ms
7: no reply
8: be1.core3.zrh3.he.net 16.226ms
9: no reply
10: no reply
11: no reply
12: no reply
13: no reply
14: no reply
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
Too many hops: pmtu 1500
Resume: pmtu 1500 From SLO host (6connect) echo onlyRFC 4890 ✗
filter likely at: destination AS211763 (CPS-IT) · min PMTU on path: 1500
Path (traceroute + mtr + PTR)
| # | IP / PTR | RTT | mtr loss | AS | AS holder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fw1-lju.6connect.com 2607:fae0:a000::2 | 0.2ms | 0%* | AS8038 | 6CONNECT - 6connect, Inc., US |
| 2 | * | - | - | - | |
| 3 | * | - | 80% | - | |
| 4 | 2a00:ee0:1:10::2 | 1.1ms | 0% | AS5603 | SIOL-NET - Telekom Slovenije, d.d., SI |
| 5 | de-cix.r60.inx.fra.de.nextlayer.net 2001:7f8::6e4:0:1 | 15.9ms | 0% | - | NA |
| 6 | ip6-ae1-0-r35.inx.vie.nextlayer.net 2a01:190:1764:2d::2 | 33.0ms | 0% | AS1764 | NEXTLAYER-AS - Next Layer Telekommunikationsdienstleistungs- und Beratungs GmbH, AT |
| 7 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | 20.9ms | 0% | AS211763 | CPS-IT - CPS-IT, AT |
Rate-limited ICMPv6: hop 3 (loss between 5% and 95% across mtr cycles - the router replies but only sometimes).
tracepath -6
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.024ms pmtu 9000
1: fw1-lju.6connect.com 0.629ms
1: fw1-lju.6connect.com 0.559ms
2: no reply
3: 2a00:ee1:800:9::1 4.341ms
4: 2a00:ee0:1:10::2 1.328ms asymm 3
5: 2a00:ee0:1:10::2 1.427ms pmtu 1500
5: de-cix.r60.inx.fra.de.nextlayer.net 15.817ms asymm 6
6: no reply
7: no reply
8: no reply
9: no reply
10: no reply
11: no reply
12: no reply
13: no reply
14: no reply
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
Too many hops: pmtu 1500From SLO host (T-2) echo onlyRFC 4890 ✗
filter likely at: destination AS211763 (CPS-IT) · min PMTU on path: 1500
Path (traceroute + mtr + PTR)
| # | IP / PTR | RTT | mtr loss | AS | AS holder |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | * | - | - | - | |
| 2 | 2a01:260:1::225 | 8.6ms | 0%* | AS34779 | T-2-AS - T-2, d.o.o., SI |
| 3 | 2a01-260-1-1--9a.core6.t-2.net 2a01:260:1:1::9a | 2.4ms | 0%* | AS34779 | T-2-AS - T-2, d.o.o., SI |
| 4 | 2a01-260-1-1--25.core6.t-2.net 2a01:260:1:1::25 | 4.7ms | 0%* | AS34779 | T-2-AS - T-2, d.o.o., SI |
| 5 | 2a01-260-1-1--2a.core6.t-2.net 2a01:260:1:1::2a | 3.7ms | 0%* | AS34779 | T-2-AS - T-2, d.o.o., SI |
| 6 | ip6-ae2-0-r35.inx.vie.nextlayer.net 2a01:190:1764:2e::2 | 39.0ms | 0% | AS1764 | NEXTLAYER-AS - Next Layer Telekommunikationsdienstleistungs- und Beratungs GmbH, AT |
| 7 | 2001:67c:10f4::1 | 18.4ms | 0% | AS211763 | CPS-IT - CPS-IT, AT |
Rate-limited ICMPv6: hop 8 (loss between 5% and 95% across mtr cycles - the router replies but only sometimes).
tracepath -6
1?: [LOCALHOST] 0.032ms pmtu 1500
1: no reply
2: 2a01:260:1::225 2.985ms
3: 2a01-260-1-1--9c.core6.t-2.net 2.636ms
4: 2a01-260-1-1--c.core6.t-2.net 4.714ms
5: 2a01-260-1-1--c.core6.t-2.net 5.339ms asymm 4
6: vix-ip6-et-0-1-2-0-r60.esh.vie.at.nextlayer.net 8.447ms asymm 5
7: no reply
8: no reply
9: no reply
10: no reply
11: no reply
12: no reply
13: no reply
14: no reply
15: no reply
16: no reply
17: no reply
Too many hops: pmtu 1500
Resume: pmtu 1500